Field | Details |
---|---|
Project Name | |
Assessment Date | |
Assessor Name | |
Project Duration | |
Funding Agency (if any) |
Rate each criterion on a scale from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent). Provide comments to elaborate on the score where necessary.
Criteria | Weight (%) | Score (1-5) | Weighted Score | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
The project exceeded expectations by engaging over 50% more participants than initially anticipated.
Comments:
Feedback highlighted satisfaction with execution but suggested more frequent updates on progress.
Comments:
Budget reports show that 98% of allocated resources were effectively used, with no major overruns.
Comments:
The project planted 10,000 trees and initiated three community-driven green zones. Survival rates need consistent monitoring.
Comments:
Limited provisions for ongoing maintenance may hinder long-term impact.
Comments:
Well-handled risks except for unavoidable weather conditions during initial stages.
Comments:
The mobile app was highly praised, providing transparency and encouraging community engagement.
Comments:
The project contributed to a 12% improvement in air quality and significantly raised environmental awareness.
Comments:
Total Weighted Score | Performance Level |
---|---|
Assessor Signature
Templates
Templates